Science:
Life's Leaping Instructions
Of all life forms, we are the fortunate one's. I'm sure Humans were in mind when the Universe was created. If the sun was any bigger or any closer to earth just by a fraction we would be burnt to a cinder. Is this all coincidence? The strength of gravity shows that it was intended to lead up to humans. Why? Because 'the strength of gravity was just the right strength for the size of the earth to support man'. Dr. Nigel Calder said, 'For man to walk on this planet with 12,000 kilometres of earth beneath his feet, man had to have the two gravity balances in his head rightly tuned.
Many scientists call this 'The Anthropic Principle'. Isaiah 45:12 puts this principle in a nutshell. I quote, 'God said, I made the earth and created man upon it.' Those first ripples in space had man in mind. It was written into space-time plan. Now the scientists say that early in the universe, deoxyribonucleic acids (DNA) were formed and that shows that life was the purpose of the universe. Why? Upon those nucleic acids the instructions of life were to be coded or written. All the instructions on how to make an animal are imposed upon nucleic acid tapes. All the instructions to make man and woman are on nucleic acid tapes. The alphabet of life, or so it can be called, is contained in the alphabet of 64 letters or cordons.
Branching out
There are false implications to the fossil record. The arrangement of the fossils to evolutionists, indicate that animals follow from one branch to another in order. This is not so. If we look at the ape fossils that have similar characteristics to us, there is not a gradual development between each branch of ape. The skeletons do not show a gradual development what so ever, even though to some scientists it appears that different species of ape, represents a development to humans.
The sequential order is put in by carbon dating, but because the time is enormous between each type of ape this produces an ineffective result. Evolutionists 'twist' the ape-skeleton evidence to their own aspiration. Darwin admitted that, in his origins of species the fossils identified that it was an act of creation between each main order of life. He also urged people to find fossil links, and if they were not found, then his theory of evolution is wrong. (The Genesis picture of how life began is a more logical solution, because the evidence clarifies with it). The overall picture is that of a series of jumps to major new types of animal. It is not now sufficient to excuse ourselves by saying that we merely need to look for more fossils. That has been done, yet the picture remains the same.
Sudden Outburst of Life
There are tremendous jumps between the four categories of this 'created'; order.
The important factor is that, between these appearances there are no fossil links or intermediary types. Anderson and Coffin, who are professional palaeontologists in Fossils in Focus, stated that the main groups have been 'created' separately and independently. I'm sure the reason that each group has it's differences and similarities is because God created us all in harmony, and decided after creating another species that 'this was good', so creating a later species along the same lines.
Leaps or Links?
Fred Hoyle also admitted later that 'evolution on earth is a series of leaps'. Because some refuse to believe it, they have brought out a succession of five new theories.
The first was by De Vries, called 'Saltation'. This merely claims that evolution was a series of sudden jumps and not a gradual advance. Obviously, that is not evolution. (If this is true, it explains how Jesus was born of the Virgin Mary).
The second was by Schindewolf. Without any evidence for it, he believed that a reptile could lay an egg which, by accident, would hatch out a fully-fledged bird! I would rather believe Genesis 1:20, 'God said, "Let birds fly above the earth across the sky"'.
The third one is nicknamed the 'hopeful monster theory'. A sheep could be born with two legs, but some ask how it could produce similar offspring if it did not meet a two-legged ram!
The fourth theory was neo-Darwinism. This builds its hopes on mutations. But mutations are faults, not improvements. In cloning they have only produced an exact copy, or a variant kind and a retarded version.
The fifth and last one, by Niles Eldridge, has the fancy name of 'Punctuated equilibria'. This suggests that an isolated population evolved independently, but its fossils have never been found.
Is there no variation at all between the species? I have to admit that mutations occur and species adapt to the environment, but this does not lead on to a different category of species. Despite of man's interference by breeding the dog, all different types of dog from the Afghan hound down to the little poodle, but they are still the same species.
